Cases 51 - 60 of 104
Scott v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv05127
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Wayne Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Scott v. Hatten
as 1:2016cv00599
Petitioner:
Roger Wayne Scott
Respondent:
S. Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Hatten
as 2:2016cv00839
Petitioner:
Roger Wayne Scott
Respondent:
S. Hatten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Colvin et al
as 3:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Scott Wayne Scott
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EL v. GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM EL
Defendant:
GREENSBORO POLICE DEPARTMENT , WAYNE SCOTT , RON ORGIAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SNIDER et al v. WAYNE WATER SYSTEMS et al
as 1:2015cv02038
Defendant:
ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION, CHANGZHOU REGAL-BELOIT SINYA MOTOR CO., LTD., JOHN CRANE INTERNATIONAL, INC. A SMITHS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
DONNA SNIDER and MICHAEL SNIDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Clifford Wheatley v. Wayne Scott, et al
as 15-40721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLIFFORD HOWARD WHEATLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
WAYNE SCOTT, Director Community Education Center, HENERY PATTERSON, Sheriff, LIBERTY COUNTY and others
Thieleman v. Scott et al
as 6:2015cv00173
Plaintiff:
Roger Thieleman
Defendant:
Wayne Scott, Joni White, Kevin Wheat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wayne Stewart v. USDC-CALA
as 14-72670
:
In re: WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Petitioner:
WAYNE SCOTT STEWART
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
E. VILLANUEVA, Correctional Officer, ISAAC MIJARES, Correctional Lieutenant, JAMES VARELA, Program Sergeant and others
Devoe v. The City Of New York, et al
as 1:2014cv02936
Plaintiff:
Sean Devoe
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Derek Tricoli, Wayne Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
