Cases 1 - 10 of 4,817
Shareef Childs v. Cheryl Webster, et al
as 24-1817
Plaintiff:
SHAREEF CHILDS
Defendant:
CHERYL WEBSTER, CRAIG LINDGREN and STEVE MOHR
Webster et al v. Husqvarna Professional Products, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Tommie L. Webster and Judy D. Webster
Defendant:
Husqvarna Professional Products, Inc., Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products, N.A., Inc. and Hometown Hardware, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Webster et al v. Eagles Landing Properties Avoca, LLC Properties et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
James M. Webster and Renee Webster
Defendant:
Eagles Landing Properties Avoca, LLC Properties, Eagles Landing Avoca Food, LLC, Eagles Landing Avoca, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner:
Webster Lee
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webster et al v. Opco LLC
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Rachel Webster, Skylor Dobbs and C.D.
Defendant:
Blue Box Opco LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Webster v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Michael Webster
Defendant:
Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Troup et al
as 2:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
Stacey Webster
Defendant:
Davonna Troup and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Webster, Jr. v. Disney, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02847
Plaintiff:
Robert Ronald Webster, Jr.
Defendant:
Disney, Inc., E.S.P.N., Inc. and Edward Canty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
