Cases 11 - 20 of 689
BRETT v. BIDEN, et al
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, JILL BIDEN, WILLIAM BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Cush-El v. State of Missouri INC. et al
as 4:2022cv00656
Plaintiff:
Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El
Defendant:
State of Missouri INC., Michael L. Parson, Eric Schmitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILEY v. US GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
DANA W. WILEY
Defendant:
US GOVERNMENT, ASSIST. SUPER. WILLIAM BARR, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelvin Miles v. William Barr, et al
as 22-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant / Appellee:
William Barr, John D. Ashcroft, Alberto R. Gonzales and others
Williams v. US Marshalls et al
as 3:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
Bridgette D. Williams
Respondent:
US Marshalls, William Barr and Warden Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. US Marshalls et al
as 3:2021cv01472
Plaintiff:
Bridgette D. Williams
Defendant:
US Marshalls, William Barr, Warden Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paul v. Brown et al
as 1:2021cv00561
Petitioner:
Melvin R. Paul
Respondent:
A. W. Brown and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cargill v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILES v. BARR et al
as 1:2021cv02271
Not Classified By Court:
KELVIN J. MILES, WILLIAM BARR, JOHN ASHCROFT and others
Plaintiff:
KELVIN MILES
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
