Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Bennett v. Department of the Interior
as 1:2026cv05029
Petitioner:
Scott William Bennett
Respondent:
Department of the Interior
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
O'Brien v. Flick et al
as 0:2026cv60587
Plaintiff:
Emmet O'Brien
Defendant:
Paul Flick, Samuel Chamberlain, William Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tubbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00032
Plaintiff:
William Bennett Tubbs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Winston v. Bennett et al
as 3:2026cv00052
Plaintiff:
Byron Winston
Defendant:
William Bennett and Kevin Wyles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Interior
as 26-1289
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Petitioner:
SCOTT WILLIAM BENNETT
Hubbard v. Manuel
as 25-30721
Plaintiff:
Lucas Michael Hubbard
Defendant:
Keith Manuel, William Bennett, Judge, Kerry Spruill, Judge and others
Purvis v. Bennett et al
as 3:2025cv01764
Plaintiff:
Demond Isacc Purvis
Defendant:
William Bennett, Kevin Wyles, David Callender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAWYER v. EXTRA STORAGE SPACE FOLCROFT, STORAGE COMPANY et al
as 2:2025cv05221
Plaintiff:
MARK SAWYER
Defendant:
EXTRA STORAGE SPACE FOLCROFT, STORAGE COMPANY, WILLIAM BENNETT, ESIS, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Purvis v. Bennett et al
as 3:2025cv00797
Plaintiff:
Demond Isacc Purvis
Defendant:
William Bennett, Kevin Wyles and David Callender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harding et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11563
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas LLC, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Harding, Paul Lindbom, Derek Karpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 a1 Federal Officer Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
