Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Patterson v. USA
as 3:2016cv01195
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Georgelas v. Patterson
as 2:2016cv00530
Plaintiff:
Tammy B. Georgelas
Defendant:
William Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
THOMPSON v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2015cv01712
Defendant:
MARK BRITTON, WILLIAM BUECKERS, BRIAN BURNETT and others
Plaintiff:
BILLIE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Roger Deal, Sr. v. Donna Patterson
as 15-6344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER LEE DEAL, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA WILLIAMS PATTERSON, STEVEN PATTERSON, SR., JEFFREY BLEDSOLE and others
HINKLEDIRE v. PREBISH et al
as 3:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY S. HINKLEDIRE
Defendant:
JOHN J. PREBISH, CHRISTIAN SMITH, WILLIAM PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINKLEDIRE v. PREBISH et al
as 3:2015cv00048
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY S. HINKLEDIRE
Defendant:
JOHN J. PREBISH, CHRISTIAN SMITH, WILLIAM PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINKLEDIRE v. LENGENFELDER et al
as 3:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY S. HINKLEDIRE
Defendant:
DOUGLAS R. LENGENFELDER, MARK WISSINGER, THOMAS C. CHERNISKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NYSA Series Trust et al v. Espsco Syracuse, LLC, et al
as 5:2014cv01089
Plaintiff:
NYSA Series Trust , Lew Rumsmoke , Leah Gabelman and others
Defendant:
ESPSCO Syracuse, LLC, Patrick Dessein, Brett Greenky, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Patterson v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2013dp21574
Plaintiff:
William Patterson
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
