Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Ross v. Moon Valley Justice Court et al
as 2:2009cv01453
Plaintiff:
William Ross
Defendant:
Moon Valley Justice Court, Rebecca MacBeth and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
In the matter of Subpoenas to Federal Employees William Ross and Michael Sheffield v. Subpoenas issued by Robert A Morrison
as 3:2008mc00034
Plaintiff:
In the matter of Subpoenas to Federal Employees William Ross and Michael Sheffield
Defendant:
Subpoenas issued by Robert A Morrison
Ross et al v. Reserve Management Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10261
Plaintiff:
William Ross, William Ross, William Ross and others
Defendant:
Reserve Management Company, Inc., Reserve Short -Term Investment Trust, Reserve Yield Plus Fund and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ross v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2007cv01048
Plaintiff:
William Ross and William Ross
Defendant:
Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Watkins, III v. Ledbetter, etal
as 6:2007cv06066
Plaintiff:
Eddie S Watkins, III
Defendant:
Chad Ledbetter, Grice, Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ross v. ASC for Wells Fargo Home Improvement et al
as 2:2007cv01061
Plaintiff:
William Ross, Jr.
Defendant:
ASC for Wells Fargo Home Improvement and American Mortgage Express Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
L & B Transport, LLC v. Beech
as 3:2007cv00146
Plaintiff:
L & B Transport, LLC
Defendant:
William Ross Beech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hill v. USA
as 3:2007cv70003
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William Ross Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
William Ross v. A.H. Bennett Co., et al.
as ND/1:01-CV-00126
Defendant:
A.H. Bennett Co
Plaintiff:
William Ross
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
