Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jeremy Defour v. Lieutenant Webber
as 23-7010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY PAUL DEFOUR
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT WEBBER, OFFICER BEATY, a/k/a Officer Bates, INTELLIGENCE OFFICER ROSSON and others
Blake (ID 96323) v. Williams et al
as 5:2023cv03186
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Deputy Warden Bos, Deputy Warden House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01377
Plaintiff:
Shaidon Blake
Defendant:
Warden Williams, Deputy Warden Bos, Deputy Warden House and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DeFour v. Webber et al
as 7:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jeremy DeFour
Defendant:
Webber, Bates, Woodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavares v. Macomber, et al
as 21-1260
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR A. TAVARES
Defendant / Appellee:
C/O SPADONI, C/O ANTONELLI, JOSHUA MACOMBER, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PATRICIA ANNE COYNE-FAGUE, in her official capacity as Director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections
Lee v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Captain McCovery, Patrice Richie Jones, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Lee and Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses v. Warden Moore
as 4:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Warden Moore
Plaintiff:
Robert Arthur Moses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Tefft et al
as 4:2016cv04102
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Gardner
Defendant:
N. Tefft, Lieutenant Adams and Warden Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duff v. Griffie et al
as 4:2016cv04095
Plaintiff:
James Ernest Duff, II
Defendant:
Corporal Griffie , S. King, Golden Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blake v. Moore et al
as 4:2016cv04078
Plaintiff:
Jeremi Blake
Defendant:
Warden Moore and Golden Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
