Cases 21 - 30 of 2,037
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jones
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Shawn McKenzie, Judy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Webb, Jr. v. Kirk Neal, et al
as 24-1439
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH WEBB, JR.
Defendant:
KIRK NEAL, Corporal at SCI and C/O EDGAR VERDE
Baker v. Colbert et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
James Lee Baker
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Colbert, Unknown Chambers, Dr., A.W. Ping and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Joshua Webbs v. Michael Shey, et al
as 24-1254
Plaintiff:
Joshua Isiah Webbs
Defendant:
Michael Shey, Kandis Fryar, Karen Anderson and others
WEBB v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
MERLE ROSS WEBB
Defendant:
KELLY MCCAFFERTY, ARAYANNA MOSS and AKILAH LAMAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb-EL v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb-EL
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission and I. Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Webb v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Webb
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Jeffery Smith, Jackie Bausman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowland v. Adams, et al
as 24-4008
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE TAYLOR ROWLAND, JR.
Defendant:
R. ADAMS, Officer, FNU WEBB, Officer, B. EGBERT, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
