Cases 1 - 10 of 1,388
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
WESTBROOK v. GRAHAM et al
as 1:2025cv00444
Plaintiff:
HARRINGTON JAMES WESTBROOK
Defendant:
SHAQKERA GRAHAM, SOMMERS and MALOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westbrook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2025cv02056
Plaintiff:
Bernina L. Westbrook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Shaw v. Texas
as 25-50134
Plaintiff:
Oscar L. Shaw
Defendant:
State of Texas, Greg Abbott, Governor of the State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas and others
Brown v. Sherry, et al
as 25-6018
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE JOE BROWN
Defendant:
FNU SHERRY, FNU WESTBROOKS and WARDEN GOLDEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Westbrook v. McFarland
as 1:2025cv00875
Petitioner:
Rickey Dashun Westbrook
Respondent:
Andrew McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Westbrook et al
as 5:2025cv00113
Defendant:
Marilyn Westbrook and Minnesota Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Wrongful Death
Westbrook v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2025cv00058
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Westbrook
Defendant:
State of Texas, Jefferson County Correctional Facility, Beaumont Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amdor v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv01062
Plaintiff:
Crystal Amdor doing business as Charlene Westbrook
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
