Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 50,236
Mikhael et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03368
Plaintiff: Marleen Youel Mikhael and Tema Zya Adam
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas and Antony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Niewiedzial v. Adams
as 3:2024cv01176
Plaintiff: Michael Niewiedzial
Defendant: Trisha Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardeley v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Marque Gardeley
Defendant: James Dzurenda, William A. Gittere, David C. Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAPIRO v. CIANBRO INC
as 2:2024cv00142
Plaintiff: ADAM SHAPIRO
Defendant: CIANBRO INC doing business as CIANBRO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Markel American Insurance Company v. Ulanski et al
as 1:2024cv03303
Plaintiff: Markel American Insurance Company
Defendant: Jason Ulanski, Eliasard Alcauter, Jacob Biros and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
COHEN
as 2:2024mc00019
WEBB v. TENN MOR PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Kathryn WEBB
Defendant: TENN MOR PROPERTIES, LLC, Adam Tripp, Tina K Tripp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gomez v. Garza
as 24-40271
Plaintiff: Adam M. Gomez, Jr.
Defendant: Eric Garza, Cameron County Sheriff, Robert Gracia, Cameron County Chief Deputy Sheriff, Cameron County and others
Anderson v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Phoenix
as 24-2574
Petitioner: IRA JOE ANDERSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Interested Party: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, Director, ADCRR, KARANJA ADAMS, Nurse Practitioner at Naphcare Inc., RODNEY STEWART, Doctor at Naphcare Inc. and others
Adams v. FAA
as 24-9528
Petitioner: BRUCE ADAMS, DBA Southwest Safaris
Respondent: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?