Cases 1 - 10 of 100
WILLIAMS v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04372
Plaintiff:
DEEANNA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01625
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Mahmoud v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2026cv01886
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Machlan v. Williams
as 3:2026cv00473
Plaintiff:
Robert Machlan
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Williams, C. Coss and Imbreza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Williams et al
as 1:2026cv01116
Plaintiff:
Queontay DL Chapman
Defendant:
Officer Williams and Milwaukee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Botto v. WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC
as 2:2026cv06847
Plaintiff:
Nancy Lopez Botto
Defendant:
WILLIAMS-SONOMA STORES, INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
WILLIAMS v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04359
Plaintiff:
BRENNA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Paz v. Roby
as 2:2026cv14218
Plaintiff:
Christian L Paz
Defendant:
Judge William Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright et al v. Abbott Laboratories., Inc.
as 1:2026cv07328
Plaintiff:
PARIS WRIGHT and Demetrius Williams
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
