Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Payne et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Lynn Payne, John Jeffery Heineck, James Marshall Strock and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Payne et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv01559
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Lynn Payne, John Jeffery Heineck, James Marshall Strock and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
EVANS v. CAREY et al
as 2:2022cv03769
Plaintiff:
TASHA L EVANS
Defendant:
SERGEANT WILLIAM CAREY, JR., OFFICER JAY RATTMANN, OFFICER DANIEL MULLARKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Simmons v. Cooper
as 5:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Simmons
Defendant:
William Carey Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carey et al v. Salvadore
as 6:2018cv06307
Plaintiff:
William Carey and Barbara Carey
Defendant:
Lisa Salvadore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE v. ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. et al
as 3:2018cv04110
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY PHYSICIANS UNITED RECIPROCAL EXCHANGE
Defendant:
ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO. , WILLIAM CAREY and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Samuel Love v. Michael William Carey et al
as 5:2018cv00567
Defendant:
Michael William Carey and Does
Plaintiff:
Samuel Love
YOUNG v. CITY OF CHESTER, PA et al
as 2:2017cv03066
Plaintiff:
DEVON YOUNG
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER, PA, MARC BARAG and WILLIAM CAREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
