Cases 31 - 40 of 128
Ashby v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 8:2019cv00926
Plaintiff:
William Ashby and William Mark Ashby
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-DO-SHC-046.000 et al
as 1:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Martha Lee Williams, Pam Saunders, ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-DO-SHC-046.000 and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
William Scott v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 19-1022
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Mark Scott
Respondent / Appellee:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
William Mark Corporation v. Cloud Commerce Systems Limited
as 1:2019cv00765
Defendant:
Cloud Commerce Systems Limited
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Slayton v. City of Ecorse et al
as 2:2018cv13904
Defendant:
Jarrod Fedea, Craig Cieszkowski, James Frierson and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Slayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isbell v. Bodway et al
as 2:2018cv03982
Defendant:
Ramon Gomez, Ryan Shell, Frank Valenzuela and others
Plaintiff:
William Mark Isbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest
as 4:2018cv03552
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Compay of the Midwest
Plaintiff:
William Marks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Isbell v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2018cv02705
Defendant:
Rosemary Nelson, Ramon Gomez, Declan M McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
William Mark Isbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAM MARK CORPORATION v. 1&CC, et al.
as 1:2018cv03889
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARK CORPORATION
Defendant:
20D, AAAY, BENXIONG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Ketchum v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00102
Plaintiff:
William Mark Ketchum
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
