Cases 11 - 20 of 1,355
Zenon v. Reckon Media LLC et al
as 1:2023cv10352
Plaintiff:
Samantina Zenon
Defendant:
Reckon Media LLC and Google Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Quinton Handlon v. Google, Inc.
as 23-13795
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTON PAUL HANDLON
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE, INC.
Nadia Metroka v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 23-2847
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NADIA M. METROKA
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, LOWER MORELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, KELLY E. HEIST, INDIVDUALLY AND AS OFFICER/AGENT FOR LOWER MORELAND TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT AND/OR AGENCY DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00165
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SWEENEY v. GOOGLE, INC. et al
as 3:2023cv20978
Plaintiff:
Conor Sweeney
Defendant:
GOOGLE, INC., ALPHABET INC, GOOGLE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu et al
as 3:2023cv04620
Defendant:
Thiruvenkatasamy, Senthilrajan, Pradeep Puli Rukmangatha Sairam Babu and others
Plaintiff:
Nagarajan Duraisamy
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Elbaum v. Google, Inc.
as 8:2023cv02398
Plaintiff:
Saul Elbaum
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Williams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Etukudor Williams
Defendant:
United States of America, Google Inc., PACER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Alphabet Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01292
Plaintiff:
Cortez Daundre Jones
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc, Google Inc, David Tepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Handlon v.Google, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Quinton Paul Handlon
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
