Cases 81 - 90 of 826,971
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Hairston v. Henry County Adult Detention Center
as 7:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jamun Daray Hairston
Defendant:
Henry County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HURLEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
JOHN HURLEY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Ortiz v. NewRez LLC
as 24-1463
Plaintiff:
DIOMEDES ORTIZ
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Barlow v. Town of Colorado City
as 24-3118
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR E. BARLOW
Defendant:
TOWN OF COLORADO CITY, an Arizona Municipal Corporation
Amherst Psychiatric Services v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 3:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Amherst Psychiatric Services
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gentry et al v. Tennessee Department of Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Howard Gentry and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Treasury, David H. Lillard, Jr. and The Nashville Community Bail Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lint Chiropractic, PC v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA
as 2:2024cv10693
Plaintiff:
Lint Chiropractic, P.C. (Assignee of Nehemiah Cook) and Lint Chiropractic PC
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
