Cases 1 - 10 of 826,942
Dowles v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Desi Lamont Dowles, Jr
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Schneider Finance, Inc. v. Jazztique LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Schneider Finance, Inc.
Defendant:
Jazztique LLC and Jasmine Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Robertson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rashaad Robertson
Respondent:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
UNIVERSAL PRESERVACHEM, INC. v. BRADY ENTERPRISES INC.
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL PRESERVACHEM, INC. and UNIVERSAL PRESERV-A-CHEM, INC.
Defendant:
BRADY ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
AMERSON v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER L AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL, DEPUTY WARDEN CURTIS L JEFFERIES, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Whittle et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Lockhart
Defendant:
Chris Whittle and Officer Marley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ortiz v. NewRez LLC
as 24-1463
Plaintiff:
DIOMEDES ORTIZ
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Barlow v. Town of Colorado City
as 24-3118
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR E. BARLOW
Defendant:
TOWN OF COLORADO CITY, an Arizona Municipal Corporation
Amherst Psychiatric Services v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 3:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Amherst Psychiatric Services
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
