Cases 91 - 100 of 5,657
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Allen v. Onondaga County Sheriff's Office et al
as 9:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Nyquest Allen and Nyequest Allen
Defendant:
Onondaga County Sheriff's Office, County of Onondaga, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELCASTRO et al v. SIMPLEX HOMES, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
VINCENT BELCASTRO and PATRICIA BELCASTRO
Defendant:
SIMPLEX HOMES, INC., GREGORY PETERS, APPLE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. 569 FERNWOOD INC. et al
as 3:2024cv02042
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., KIRSCHNER CBS MUSIC PUBLISHING, VELVET APPLE MUSIC and others
Defendant:
569 FERNWOOD INC. doing business as LIBRARY IV and BRIAN O'KEENEY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Scales et al v. Apple Incorporation
as 1:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
William Scales and Tranz Technologies
Defendant:
Apple Incorporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coronavirus Reporter Corporation et al v. Apple Inc
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Coronavirus Reporter Corporation and Calid Inc
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Touchmusic Entertainment LLC v. Apple Inc,
as 1:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
Touchmusic Entertainment LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gamboa v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
Julianna Felix Gamboa
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Gregory v. Spt. Municipal et al
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Gregory
Defendant:
Spt. Municipal, Sheriff Chuck F. Wright, Major Leso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
