Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,184,777
White v. ODRC Director et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Larry White
Defendant:
ODRC Director, Le.C.I Warden, Le.C.I Warden's Ms. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ivan
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Trashon Williams
Defendant:
Ivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Wallens Ridge St. Prison et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Wallens Ridge St. Prison, C.O. Johnsin and C.O. Kennety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Roberts
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Darius Santwann Dixon
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marciano v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00304
Petitioner:
Michael Marciano
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Medical Staff RRJ et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Russell Odell Walters
Defendant:
Medical Staff RRJ, Security Staffing RRJ and Dr. Ronald Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson, Jr. v. Danfelt et al
as 3:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Maurice Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kimberly K. Danfelt, Dave Ernest, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doxtator, Gerald v. Tegels, Lizzie
as 3:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Gerald W. Doxtator
Respondent:
Lizzie Tegels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
