Cases 81 - 90 of 880,074
BANKS v. LIEBEL et al
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
DEVON BANKS
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL, J. FAUST, D. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abrego v. Garfias
as 1:2024cv02272
Petitioner:
Abel Ortiz Abrego
Respondent:
Lorena Garfias Garfias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
MACKLIN v. AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL
as 2:2024cv02215
Plaintiff:
SYEED MACKLIN
Defendant:
AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL doing business as FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MCNEIL-THOMAS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv06403
Petitioner:
RASUL MCNEIL-THOMAS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NEUMENTUM, INC. v. MCGURRIN
as 2:2024cv06395
Plaintiff:
NEUMENTUM, INC.
Defendant:
JOHN TAGGART MCGURRIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. J&C Corp
as 1:2024cv01466
Plaintiff:
BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP d/b/a HBI International
Defendant:
J&C Corp. d/b/a Juicy Concentrates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
