Cases 61 - 70 of 384,856
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Gerald v. Thurber et al
as 7:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Lukeen Gerald
Defendant:
Justin Thurber, J. Gilbert, M. Vinzant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Russell et al v. KLEB, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Kathy Russell and Larry Russell
Defendant:
KLEB, Inc. and doing business as Kentucky Lions Eyebank and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Thompson v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
David J Thompson
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickles, Mark v. Johnson, Kirsten et al
as 3:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Mark Hickles
Defendant:
Kirsten Johnson, Joel Shirck, Nick Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Richard Blackwell v. Ramsey Cty Corr. Facility, et al
as 24-2352
Plaintiff:
Richard Preston Blackwell
Defendant:
Ramsey County Correctional Facility, County of Ramsey, Unknown Does, Ramsey County Correctional Facility, sued in their personal, official, and individual capacities and others
Brown v. County of Lane, et al.
as 24-4000
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LANE, ALFREDO VELEZ, Personally, NATHAN L. GENT, Personally and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 5:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
