Cases 71 - 80 of 3,621
Williams v. T-Mobile, USA
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
T-Mobile, USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 2:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Smart RF Inc.
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile US, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Telsync Technologies LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Tolliver v. Assurance Wirless, T-Mobile et al
as 1:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Kamilah Tolliver
Defendant:
Assurance Wirless, T-Mobile, Kim Kardashian West, Kylie Jenner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Smart RF Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Smart RF Inc.
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GOODWIN v. T-MOBILE U.S. INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05655
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GOODWIN
Defendant:
T-MOBILE U.S. INC., T-MOBILE LLC, PATRICIA CAULDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
