Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Major et al v. United Bank et al
as 4:2021cv00842
Defendant:
United Bank, Crescent Mortgage Company, Crescom Mortgage and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Tracy Skeen and Daniel Major
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Skeens v. King
as 1:2020cv00749
Respondent:
Mercer County and Timothy King
Petitioner:
William Parris Skeens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Skeen v. Unknown
as 7:2020cv00513
Plaintiff:
Marc Kristopher Skeen
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skeen v. Washington County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2020cv00017
Defendant:
Josh Asbury, Seth Sparks, Washington County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Teresa Suzanne Skeen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skeens v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rufus A. Skeens
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605
Nwoga v. Karceski et al
as 1:2019cv02899
Defendant:
Richard Karceski, Law Firm of Silverman, Thompson, Slutkin & White and Howard Schulman Wright, Constable & Skeen, LLP
Plaintiff:
Susan Nwoga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Skeens v. Stanley
as 5:2019cv00628
Defendant:
Officer Stanley
Plaintiff:
William P Skeens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Skeens v. Mcoy et al
as 5:2019cv00131
Defendant:
Officer Mcoy and Southern Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
William Skeens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone et al v. McCoy et al
as 5:2019cv00050
Defendant:
Officer McCoy, Southern Regional Jail and Officer James MaCoy
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Malone, William Skeens and Eugene Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SKEEN v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA, ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00373
Plaintiff:
MARCUS SKEEN
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA , EMPLOYEE GROUP BENEFITS PLAN OF CAROLINA CONTAINER COMPANY and CAROLINA CONTAINER LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
