Cases 21 - 30 of 87
Michael Livingston v. SC Dept. of Social Services
as 20-1552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LIVINGSTON and HEATHER LIVINGSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MISTY PUCKETT, Richland County Deputy Sheriff, ANGELA SCOTT and others
Defendant:
SUSAN LUBEROFF, M.D.
Evans v. James et al
as 5:2020ct03155
Defendant:
Warden Bryan Wells, Sgt. Brandon, Andrew Steffen and others
Plaintiff:
George Reynold Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Livingston v. South Carolina Dept of Social
as 20-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LIVINGSTON and HEATHER LIVINGSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, MISTY PUCKETT, Richland County Deputy Sheriff, ANGELA SCOTT and others
Defendant:
SUSAN LUBEROFF, M.D.
Edwards v. Lambert et al
as 7:2020cv00095
Defendant:
J. Lambert, J. Puckett and K. Eldridge
Plaintiff:
Michael Derrick Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Puckett et al
as 7:2019cv00846
Defendant:
C.O. Oh and C.O. Puckett
Plaintiff:
Destined C.M.D George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAND v. BURKE et al
as 1:2019cv01084
Defendant:
JIM O'NEILL, JUDGE BURKE, J.D. STIDHAM and others
Plaintiff:
BILLY RUSSELL LAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00310
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Puckett v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 6:2018cv03276
Plaintiff:
Charles Puckett
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Puckett v. Joyner
as 1:2018cv02404
Petitioner:
James Benjamin Puckett
Respondent:
Hector Joyner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Puckett v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2018cv01158
Petitioner:
Clarence Julius Puckett, III
Respondent:
Warden Chester County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
