Cases 1 - 10 of 28
JOHNSON v. UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEWIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Richard Johnson
as 23-4331
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD KIRKLAND JOHNSON
Williams v. City of Richmond, et al.
as 3:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
Tiara Williams
Defendant:
City of Richmond and Richard Daniel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Johnson et al v. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
as 1:2022cv00548
Plaintiff:
Heather L. Johnson and Richard Allen Johnson
Defendant:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022ct03012
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis Johnson
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. ARL Transport, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00033
Defendant:
ARL Transport, LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company licensed to do business in the State of West Virginia doing business as ARL and Carlton Anthony Thomas
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Warden, USP Lee
as 7:2020cv00255
Petitioner:
Richard L Johnson
Respondent:
Warden, USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12633
Plaintiff:
Karen Johnson and Richard A. Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. PNC Bank
as 1:2019cv03136
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A. and PNC Bank
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
