Cases 1 - 10 of 830
Jarvis v. Monte
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Karen Jarvis
Defendant:
Tom D. Monte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. Tom's Plumbing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Tom's Plumbing, Inc. doing business as Mullen Plumbing, Heating and Cooling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Mohamed Mubarek
as 24-6362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
MUBAREK, Doctor, TOM GERA, P.A., VANMETER, Nurse and others
Campbell v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Tom Campbell
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Brady Spicer v. Wilkes County North Carolina
as 24-6309
Plaintiff:
BRADY LEON SPICER
Defendant:
JONATHAN CALL, Lieutenant, ROBERT CLAYTON ANDERSON, DEREK ELLIS, Parole Office and others
Jarrell v. Dyer
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Jarrell
Defendant:
Tom Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mickens v. Ayyar et al
as 1:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
Janece Mickens
Defendant:
Balan Ayyar, Tom Watson and David Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Meyers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Mike Meyers, Gary Elbert Adamson, John Edward Aguilar and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Matulaniec v. J-K Technologies, L.L.C.
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Tom Matulaniec
Defendant:
J-K Technologies, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Day v. Swain County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Paul Gordon Day
Defendant:
Swain County Detention Center, Leanna Arch, Bryson City, NC Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
