Cases 91 - 100 of 6,387
Evans v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Monroe G. Evans, III
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Craig Gable, Scott Busboom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tigue v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr
Defendant:
Scott Taylor, Leavy Watson, Lyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Emery et al
as 4:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Cleon White
Defendant:
Scott Emery, Price, D Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Key v. Higgs et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Key
Defendant:
Scott Higgs and All Around Truck, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Husbands v. Rowland et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Husbands
Defendant:
Shelly Rowland, Sabrina Williams, Scott Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Whitfield v. The Federal Government et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Jaquan Whitfield
Defendant:
The Federal Government, Chad Nixson, Scott Spurlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. US Department of Agriculture
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
US Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Aho et al v. Cass County et al
as 0:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Aho and Chad Cane
Defendant:
Cass County, Sandy Bennett, Jerri Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pace v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dakota Pace
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
