Cases 51 - 60 of 841,216
Castillo v. Lee et al
as 4:2024cv03608
Plaintiff:
Gisselle Castillo
Defendant:
Jordan ONeil Lee and P&S Transportation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Starks, Jr. v. Dotson et al
as 2:2024cv00577
Defendant:
Nehal Shah, Chadwick Dotson, Stephanie Vick and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munguia v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02534
Plaintiff:
Celia Torres Munguia
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carney v. Welch et al
as 4:2024cv00809
Defendant:
Matthew Emery Hardee, Morgan E Welch, Central Arkansas Radiation Therapy Institute Inc doing business as CARTI and others
Plaintiff:
John Michael Carney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Reaves v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00177
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Reaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carr v. Weldon
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Samuel P Carr
Defendant:
J Mark Weldon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shang v. Twitch Interactive, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv06664
Defendant:
Twitch Interactive, Inc. and Samantha Briasco-Stewart
Plaintiff:
Bo Shang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. McSee
as 3:2024cv01692
Defendant:
Vincent McSee
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02611
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
