Cases 21 - 30 of 12,628
United States of America v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv04801
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steffan Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Samuel v. Darlington County Detention Center et al
as 5:2024cv03410
Petitioner:
Steven Lewis Samuel and Steven Samuel,
Respondent:
Darlington County Detention Center, Sheriff James Hudson and Warden Wadell Coe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knight v. Calloway et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Troy Antwoan Knight
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway, Tyler W. Norman, Sgt. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00480
Petitioner:
ANTONIO LEWIS MEBANE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lewis v. USA
as 2:2024cv01453
Petitioner:
Evans Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate
MCKINNEY v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Defendant:
COUNSELOR RAULS, JOHN DOE, COII SHAKRISTY LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DEWAYNE MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Foley et al
as 2:2024cv04094
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Defendant:
Trevor Foley and Julie Kempker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gaviola Patron v. Hugh, et al
as 1:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
D'Annunzio Roman Gaviola Patron
Defendant:
Lewy Hugh, C. Mares and G. Herara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Lewis et al
as 4:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Counselor Rauls, COII Shakristy Lewis, SGT Henry Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Dewayne McKinney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F.W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, Rey R. Palop, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
