Cases 31 - 40 of 5,346
Garcia v. Unknown Staff
as 24-40318
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Unknown Staff, Director FNU Parker, U S Government and others
Boards v. English et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Carl R Webb II Boards and Carl Roy Webb II Boards
Defendant:
Loren, Arron Smith, Brian English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Edgefield Mailroom Clerks et al
as 4:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
Charlton Beasley
Defendant:
Edgefield Mailroom Clerks, Edgefield Correctional Institution, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
(PC) Parker v. Sacramento et al
as 2:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Akika Parker
Defendant:
Sacramento, El Dorado Hills, Sacramento Sheriff Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benjamin Oryang v. Waugh, et al
as 24-11287
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN BEDOGWAR ORYANG
Defendant:
WAUGH, PERRYMAN, BELL and others
Parker v. Wyles et al
as 3:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Marlowe E Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Wyles, Dep Warden Callendar, Asst Warden Callendar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Crable v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 24-3316
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. CRABLE
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, OFFICER ROBERT ALFORD, #510 and OFFICER ISAIAH PARKER, #1572
Parker v. United States of America, The
as 3:2024cv00481
Petitioner:
Randall Parker
Respondent:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
HALLE v. PARKER et al
as 2:2024cv00581
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HALLE
Respondent:
JUSTIN PARKER, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, BEAU SNEDDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fry v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00466
Petitioner:
Eric R. Fry
Respondent:
Phil Parker and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
