Cases 51 - 60 of 72,479
Hurst v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00209
Petitioner:
Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Rick Williams and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walls v. Jumper
as 4:2024cv04105
Plaintiff:
William Walls
Defendant:
Shan Jumper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rettstatt v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Rettstatt
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Page, III, Micheal Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Dodd v. Ross et al
as 1:2024cv02651
Plaintiff:
Mr. William J Dodd
Defendant:
Chief Security Ms. Sharon Ross and Warden of Jail Mr Roberts Dean, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04994
Plaintiff:
Semaj Ratliff, Larrion Brown, Rynalder Williams and others
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlick v. Zimmerman et al
as 1:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Cobretti Matlick
Defendant:
William Zimmerman, . Stinder and . Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berghoff v. Allen County Jail Staff et al
as 1:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
William Berghoff
Defendant:
Allen County Jail Staff, Quality Corr. Care, Beahl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01781
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lemon v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
William Day'Juan Lemon
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
