Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 89,881
(PC) Salazar v. Torres et al
as 2:2024cv01745
Plaintiff: Peter John Salazar
Defendant: Moses Torres, O. Perez, Shonda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis v. Hamm
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner: Wayne Holleman Travis
Respondent: John Q. Hamm
Londell Alston v. City of Rock Hill
as 24-6594
Plaintiff: LONDELL LASHUN ALSTON
Defendant: CITY OF ROCK HILL, COUNTY OF YORK, ROCK HIL POLICE DEPARTMENT JOHN DOE #1 and others
Kramer v. USA
as 3:2024cv01021
Petitioner: John Lewis Kramer
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Williams v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2024cv04064
Plaintiff: Randy Ellis Williams
Defendant: Jason Mitchell and Public Defender John Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clincy v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff: Trevon Marquise Clincy
Defendant: John Doe
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Attaway v. Glover et al
as 3:2024cv01565
Plaintiff: Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant: C/O Glover, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Plaintiff: John U. Singleton
Defendant: G. Leposky, Lightfoot, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denelsbeck v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: John Denelsbeck, III
Defendant: Ricardo Ramirez, Jeremy J. Delacruz and Daniel Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dildy v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv03612
Plaintiff: Leangelo Dildy
Defendant: City of North Charleston, John Doe, Jared Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?