Cases 51 - 60 of 4,009
Sorenson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv00804
Defendant:
Canvas Ct LLC, Cleaver-Brooks Inc, Honeywell International Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Norita C Sorenson and Reid S Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
DIMAGGIO v. AGCO COPORATION F/K/A AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MASSEY-FERGUSON, INC et al
as 2:2023cv03054
Defendant:
BELL TEXTRON INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC, AGCO COPORATION F/K/A AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO MASSEY-FERGUSON, INC, AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. (AHM); and others
Plaintiff:
ROCCO DIMAGGIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mott et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Stuart Mott and Nancy Mott
Defendant:
Raytheon Company, Goulds Pumps, LLC, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Abb, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Pneumo Abex, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hardy v. Crane Co. et al
as 1:2017cv10826
Defendant:
Crane Co., Carrier Corporation, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
FMC Corporation and Bayer Cropscience, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Riley Power Inc., A. W. Chesterton Co., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Hardy
Not Classified By Court:
Judge Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Barbara Mann v. AO Smith Corp, et al
as 21-2361
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA MANN, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD NYBECK
Defendant / Appellee:
AO SMITH CORP, ALLEN BRADLEY CO, CT CORPORATION SYSTEMS, ARVIN MERITOR, SUCCESSOR TO ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING and others
Appellee:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST
Defendant:
ALLEN BRADLEY CO and RAYLOC COMPANY
WHERRY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03376
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC, KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER CO., AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP. and others
Cross Defendant:
AMERICAN BILTRITE INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, PEP BOYS and others
Cross Claimant:
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, 3M COMPANY, PEERLESS PUMP and others
Plaintiff:
GAIL ANN JAKUBAC-WHERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
WILLIAMS v. GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00552
Plaintiff:
HAMISH WILLIAMS, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM A. JONES and HAMISH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
GASBARRE PRODUCTS INC., INDUCTOTHERM CORPORATION, LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Boudreaux v. Bossier et al
as 2:2019cv12355
Defendant:
ExxonMobil Corporation, J. Melton Garrett, CBS Corporation and others
Cross Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC, Turner Industries Group, LLC, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
3Rd Party Defendant:
Uniroyal Holding, Inc. and Manville Personal Injury Settlement Trust
Plaintiff:
Edward J Boudreaux, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
