Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Williams v. Cherokee Nation Entertainment
as 11-5107
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES H. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHEROKEE NATION ENTERTAINMENT, L.L.C.
Williams v. Cherokee Nation Entertainment, L.L.C.
as 4:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
James H Williams
Defendant:
Cherokee Nation Entertainment, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
James Williams, et al v. John Witsell
as 11-5694
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. WILLIAMS, next friend TW and RANDY J. SCHONAGEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN WITSELL
Daljit Jandu v. USA, et al
as 11-50156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DALJIT S JANDU
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY, JAMES E WILLIAMS, President MTSU, President of Middle Tennessee State University and others
James Williams v. Michael Studivent
as 10-2039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL STUDIVENT, Official Capacity, TOMMY STEVENS, Individual and Official Capacity, DEBORAH LANKFORD, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Brown v. Watson et al
as 3:2010cv03080
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Brown
Defendant:
Yolanda Watson, Mike Pippin, Kent Villines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Witsell
as 3:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
James E Williams, James E Williams and Randy J Schonagen
Defendant:
John Witsell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WILLIAMS v. STURDIVENT et al
as 1:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL STURDIVENT, TOMMY STEVENS, DEBORAH LANKFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Hoosack et al
as 1:2009cv01329
Plaintiff:
James P. Williams
Defendant:
Vincent Hoosack, Corey Harris, John Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. National Tire & Battery et al
as 4:2007cv00439
Plaintiff:
James A Williams
Defendant:
National Tire & Battery and Tire Kingdom Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
