Cases 11 - 20 of 1,022
Pabon v. Gutierrez et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Osvaldo Diaz Pabon
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. Lumpkins
as 4:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
Nelson Diaz
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkins and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vazquez-Diaz v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv03019
Petitioner:
Luis A Vazquez-Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
(HC) Diaz v. State of California
as 1:2023cv01783
Petitioner:
Antonio Diaz
Respondent:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DIAZ v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00584
Petitioner:
ROLANDO DIAZ
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL, ENGLISH, WADHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01926
Petitioner:
Hector Diaz Perez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vazquez-Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10639
Petitioner:
Luis A. Vazquez-Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DIAZ-VELEZ v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2023cv22768
Petitioner:
LUIS DIAZ-VELEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez-Diaz v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01725
Petitioner:
Efrain Sanchez-Diaz
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz-Diaz v. Heckard
as 5:2023hc02247
Petitioner:
Aristides Diaz-Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Katrina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
