Cases 21 - 30 of 63
JOHNSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2017cv02414
Petitioner:
JAMES JOHN JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Frakes
as 8:2017cv00039
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes
Petitioner:
James D. Johnson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Johnson v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 16-3289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
JOHNSON v. SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv01444
Petitioner:
JAMES J. JOHNSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. KERESTES et al
as 1:2015cv00118
Petitioner:
JAMES EARL JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN W. KERESTES , ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA - KATHLEEN G. KANE and ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Johnson v. Wendy Kelley
as 15-1760
Petitioner / Appellant:
James Wesley Johnson
Respondent / Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
James Johnson v. Wendy Kelley
as 15-1760
Petitioner - Appellant:
James Wesley Johnson
Respondent - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Johnson v. Hollingsworth
as 1:2014cv03099
Petitioner:
James Curtis Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Hollingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
James W Johnson
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Sexton
as 3:2013cv00737
Petitioner:
James Paris Johnson
Respondent:
David Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
