Cases 71 - 80 of 1,464
Randall v. Renzi et al
as 9:2022cv01381
Petitioner:
Jarrod Carl Randall
Respondent:
Hon. Judge Eugene Renzi, Kristopher Sterns, Kim Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woods v. Warden of MCTC
as 1:2022cv03135
Petitioner:
Thomas Woods
Respondent:
Warden of MCTC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. United States Parole Commission
as 5:2022cv00294
Petitioner:
Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ashby v. Woods et al
as 3:2022cv07445
Petitioner:
Defonte T. Ashby
Respondent:
Beverly Woods, Erin Lynch, Kim Cattreres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Tynon
as 22-2974
Petitioner / Appellant:
Joseph Woods
Respondent / Appellee:
Teresa Tynon, Superintendent
Cassaday #71417-509 v. Woods
as 1:2022cv01044
Petitioner:
Kevin Cassaday #71417-509
Defendant:
William Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ashford v. Woods
as 2:2022cv01088
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ashford v. Woods
as 4:2022cv01088
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Ashford
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WOODS v. NEAL
as 1:2022cv02104
Petitioner:
JESS DAVID WOODS
Respondent:
RON NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv01144
Petitioner:
DeAngelo Woods
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
