Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Vaughner v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2023cv60906
Plaintiff:
Ferris Vaughner
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ferris v. Berry
as 4:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
James Martin Ferris
Respondent:
Warden Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Todd Ferry v. Superintendent Laurel Highlands SCI, et al
as 23-1210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TODD FERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEDFORD COUNTY
FERRY v. HAINESWORTH et al
as 3:2021cv00214
Petitioner:
TODD FERRY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MS. HAINESWORTH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BEDFORD COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuhrman v. Ferry County Superior Court
as 2:2021cv00083
Respondent:
Ferry County Superior Court
Petitioner:
Michael B Fuhrman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ferry v. Bexar County Jail
as 5:2020cv00200
Petitioner:
William Ray Ferry
Respondent:
Bexar County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ferris v. Gomez
as 5:2019cv00179
Petitioner:
Edward Lavon Ferris
Respondent:
Christopher Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(HC) Ferris v. Foss
as 2:2019cv00626
Petitioner:
David Ferris
Respondent:
T. Foss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coles v. Wind River Detention Center Acting Warden et al
as 1:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tijay Coles
Defendant:
Jennie Ferris, Acting Warden, Terri Smith Chief Judge Wind River Tribal Court Shoshone and Arapaho Tribes in Wyoming, Wind River Indian Reservation, Wind River Detention Center Acting Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Lee v. Shartle
as 4:2018cv00199
Petitioner:
Ferris Lavelle Lee
Respondent:
JT Shartle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
