Cases 1 - 10 of 3,579
(HC)Massie v. Guzman
as 1:2024cv00726
Petitioner:
Luis Jesus Massie
Respondent:
F. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Purcell #319445 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01455
Petitioner:
Donald Wade Purcell
Respondent:
Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puana v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01088
Petitioner:
Rudolph Puana
Respondent:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SMITH v. COCROFT et al
as 2:2024cv03215
Petitioner:
DEONDRE E. SMITH
Respondent:
Judge Kimberly Cocroft, JEFF ZEZECH, GEORGE WHARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jenkins v. Corey
as 9:2024cv00765
Petitioner:
Willie F. Jenkins
Respondent:
Joseph Corey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams (PS) v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01107
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Williams
Respondent:
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. F. Williams, A. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hallman v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00544
Petitioner:
Robert F Hallman
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lorence Smith, II v. Warden
as 24-6552
Petitioner:
LORENCE F. SMITH, II
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI Bennettsville
Curran v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00691
Petitioner:
John F. Curran
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caldwell v. Lumpkin
as 24-20239
Petitioner:
Robert F. Caldwell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
