General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 45
STOVER v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00870
Petitioner: JESSE JAMES STOVER
Respondent: DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Arkansas Division of Corrections We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00752
Plaintiff: Jesse James Howard
Defendant: Arkansas Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copen v. Lanham
as 5:2022cv00135
Petitioner: Jesse James Copen
Respondent: Brian/Kelly Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Copen v. Lanham We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00078
Petitioner: Jesse James Copen
Respondent: Kelly Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abbott v. Arizona, State of
as 3:2020cv08293
Respondent: Arizona, State of
Petitioner: Jesse James Abbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Dunlap v. State of Texas
as 3:2020cv02044
Petitioner: Jesse James Dunlap
Respondent: State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Johnson
as 4:2019cv00351
Respondent: Bob Johnson
Petitioner: Jessie James Jones, Sr. and Jesse James Jones
Interested Party: Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sweeney #846175 v. Skipper We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00503
Petitioner: Jesse James Sweeney #846175
Respondent: Gregory Skipper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kottenbrock v. State of Washington We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00799
Petitioner: Jesse James Kottenbrock
Respondent: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2019cv05456
Petitioner: Jesse James Kottenbrock
Respondent: State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?