Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Ricky Scott v. Fletcher Long
as 12-3549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ricky Lee Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
Fletcher Long, Prosecuting Attorney, First Judicial District
Ricky Hankins v. David Boehn
as 12-7176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY LEE HANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BOEHN, Warden
Hankins v. Boehm
as 7:2012cv00297
Defendant:
David Boehm
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Hankins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Long
as 2:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Scott
Defendant:
Fletcher Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroble v. Livingston et al
as 1:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Stroble
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Jennifer Smith and Joni White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmaling v. Allen et al
as 2:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Schmaling
Defendant:
Gail Allen and State of Wisconsin Division of Probation & Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIROIS v. CICHON et al
as 1:2012cv00028
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE SIROIS
Defendant:
AL CICHON, PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, CARMEN MULLHOLLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parson v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2011cv01368
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Parson
Defendant:
Norman Rhodes, Bobby Spicer, City Of Tiptonville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Sacramento County Main Jail et al
as 2:2011cv02536
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Stewart
Defendant:
Sacramento County Main Jail, State District Attorney and State Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lee Hunt
Defendant:
Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, State Medical Director for Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections and Institutional Health Care Administrator, North Central Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
