Cases 81 - 90 of 95
WILLIAMS v. CULPEPPER
as 5:2011cv00378
Plaintiff:
HENRY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CULPEPPER, SIMMONS and SINCLAIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jon Wallace v. Wesley Smith, et al
as 11-16344
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JON MORRIS WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
WESLEY SMITH, Dr., Individually and in his official capacity, JOHN C. COOPER, SUSAN R. BOLTON and others
Sinclair et al v. Budz et al
as 2:2010cv00617
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sinclair and Robert Williams
Defendant:
Timothy Budz, George Emaniolidis, Rodney Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Stout et al
as 4:2010cv01090
Plaintiff:
Shalonda Campbell
Defendant:
Carl Stout, Mark Culbertson, Richard Spades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCCLAIN v. PREBISH et al
as 3:2010cv00132
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN J. PREBISH, CHRISTIAN SMITH, WILLIAM PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Skinner v. ADOC, et al
as 09-16848
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. SKINNER
Defendant - Appellee:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SINCLAIR, CO II, #1098 at ASPC-Florence and RIOS, CO II, #3242
Skinner v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv01363
Plaintiff:
James E Skinner
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Sinclair and Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Warden FCI Edgefield
as 3:2009cv01046
Plaintiff:
Sinclair L Atkins, Jr
Defendant:
Warden FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Sinclair v. Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2009cv00773
Plaintiff:
Gary R. Sinclair
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriffs Office, West County Detention Facility, Warren E. Rupf and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SINCLAIR v. LANE
as 4:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS SINCLAIR
Defendant:
ERIC LANE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
