Cases 1 - 10 of 132
French et al v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01462
Plaintiff:
Marcellus French, Allen Ford, Nicholas Ayala and others
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Sterrett, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. Unknown Party #1 et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Markeese Chappell
Defendant:
Unknown Party #1, Scott Wriggelsworth, Ingham County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappel v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Todd Chappel
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHLOE WARGNY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappelle v. Jackson et al
as 6:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Chappelle
Defendant:
Austin Reeve Jackson, Unknown Nipp, Larry Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. Young et al
as 5:2022ct03124
Plaintiff:
Bryan Colby Chappell
Defendant:
Norman Young, S. Goss, Warden R. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jason Chappell v. Officer Franklin
as 22-6355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON ERNEST CHAPPELL
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER FRANKLIN, LT. SWETT, SGT. DEAVER and others
Defendant:
CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER, JAMES ALDER and MEDICAL SERVICE SYSTEM
Chappell v. Young et al
as 3:2021cv01046
Plaintiff:
Leon Chappell
Defendant:
Sgt. Young, C/O Davis, Warden Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Smith et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00688
Plaintiff:
Antrun Lashun Pierce
Defendant:
Otis Smith, Officer McClain, Sgt. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAPPELL v. RHODES et al
as 2:2020cv00686
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FCI DENTIST, RHODES and VAN WAGNER
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COLBY CHAPPELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
