Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Walden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 1:2019cv00288
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dayne Walden
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gibbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00664
Defendant:
COMM'R of SOC S ANDREW M. SAUL and Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
KENNETH GIBBS
Not Yet Classified:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Williams v. SSA (Social Security Administration)
as 1:2019cv00983
Defendant:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Martin v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00437
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Nicole Susan Martin
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hayden v. Berryhill
as 4:2019cv00187
Plaintiff:
Melisha Y. Hayden
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Tonissen v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00614
Plaintiff:
Patricia A. Tonissen
Defendant:
Acting Comm. of SSA Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Aggrey v. State of Utah
as 2:2018cv00904
Defendant:
State of Utah
Plaintiff:
Dominic Taban Aggrey
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
HUFF v. BERRYHILL
as 3:2018cv02152
Plaintiff:
Mertonia Letitia Huff
Defendant:
SSA Commissioner Nancy Ann Berryhill and NANCY ANN BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Cockrell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv01124
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carmalitta I. Cockrell
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
GILLIAM v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv01652
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
DAWN M. GILLIAM
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
