Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Watson v. Ponds et al
as 2:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tom Watson
Defendant:
Randy Ponds , GPS Claims Services Inc , Auto-Owners Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ott et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Casey Ott and Stephanie Ott
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Social Language Processing, Inc. v. Ott et al
as 5:2013cv00401
Plaintiff:
Social Language Processing, Inc.
Defendant:
Myle Ott , Jeffrey T. Hancock and Claire Cardie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Beverage Management Systems, Inc. v. Ott
as 1:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Beverage Management Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Ott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
OTT et al v. OPEN RISK LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01939
Plaintiff:
CRAIG J. OTT , SHAJY MATHAI and RICHARD MURNANE
Defendant:
OPEN RISK LLC, JAMES AYLWARD and SCOTT WAXLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Beverage Management Systems, Inc. v. Ott
as 3:2012cv02126
Plaintiff:
Beverage Management Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Ott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Social Language Processing, Inc. v. Ott et al
as 0:2012cv62286
Plaintiff:
Social Language Processing, Inc.
Defendant:
Myle Ott , Jeffrey T. Hancock and Claire Cardie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Otte v. Powerhouse Partners, LLC
as 4:2012cv01999
Plaintiff:
Robert Otte
Defendant:
Powerhouse Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
OTT v. EBIX, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01464
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH OTT
Defendant:
EBIX, INC. and ACCLAMATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
PHL Variable Insurance Company v. Otte
as 3:2011cv01008
Plaintiff:
PHL Variable Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gary Otte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
