Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Baumann v. Advanced Technology Services et al
as 8:2019cv01049
Defendant:
Advanced Technology Services, Aeroquip Corporation, Omron Scientific Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Baumann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rash v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 4:2020cv00294
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Nancy Rash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Long v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2019cv12778
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Terri Lynn Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2018cv02054
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rogers v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2018cv02054
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Pinson et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2017cv00333
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Joyce Pinson and Randall :Pinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Ingersoll-Rand Company et al
as 2:2015cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dennis Davis
Defendant:
Ingersoll-Rand Company, 3M Company f/k/a Minnesota, Mining and Manufacturing Company, Aurora Pump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Brandt v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 8:2015cv00006
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rebecca M Brandt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BENGE et al v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 1:2012cv01248
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BONNIE R. BENGE and EARL G. BENGE
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Schwartz et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2012cv11288
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Schwartz and Gary Schwartz
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
