Cases 11 - 20 of 148
Nixon v. Detroit, City of et al
as 5:2023cv11547
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nixon
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Detective Moises Jimenez, Commander James Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keith Edwards v. J. Grubbs, et al
as 23-11427
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH EDWARDS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. GRUBBS and CITY OF ATLANTA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
GRUBB v. MEADE et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY GRUBB
Defendant:
JEFREY MEADE, TANNER HURLEY and ISP TROOPER 9448
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hollins v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2023cv00040
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Hollins
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga and Phillip Grubbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garvey Farm LP et al v. City of Elsmere, Kentucky et al
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Garvey Farm LP and Flagship Communities Reit
Defendant:
City of Elsmere, Kentucky, Matt Dowling, Gloria Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Abdullah v. Grubb Properties, Inc.
as 1:2022cv04971
Plaintiff:
Tara Abdullah
Defendant:
Grubb Properties, Inc.
Ivey et al v. Grubbs et al
as 1:2022cv04836
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel Ivey and Marcus D. Ivey
Defendant:
Adele P. Grubbs, David Emerson, Catherine M. Salinas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
reVamped LLC et al v. Pipestone, City of et al
as 0:2022cv02881
Plaintiff:
reVamped LLC, Heliocentrix LLC, Tammy Grubbs and others
Defendant:
Pipestone, City of and Doug Fortune
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
