Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
YORK v. WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK
as 1:2019cv01207
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH YORK
Defendant:
WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gibens et al v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Internal Revenue Service, Hoist Liftruck Mfg LLC, Woodforest National Bank and others
Defendant:
Premier Credit of North America LLC, Porter County Circuit Court Judge Pro Tem, Carrie N Crider and others
Plaintiff:
Reactive Power LLC and John Gibens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00446
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ronnie Ceasar v. Equiafax Credit Reporting, et al
as 17-30854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONNIE R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee:
EQUIAFAX CREDIT REPORTING, WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK HOUSTON, WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK ALEXANDRIA and others
Ceasar v. Equiafax Credit Reporting et al
as 1:2017cv01167
Plaintiff:
Ronnie R Ceasar
Defendant:
Equiafax Credit Reporting, Woodforest National Bank Houston, Woodforest National Bank Alexandria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
