Cases 21 - 30 of 181
Barrow v. Dayton Living Word et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barrow
Defendant:
Dayton Living Word, Jackie Murray, Pat Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
T.B. v. Doffermyre et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
T. B.
Defendant:
Jeffrey Macialek, David E. Pitman, Shauna D Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Dalton v. Richmond County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Bertina Renae Brunson Mealing Dalton and Bertina R. Dalton
Defendant:
Pen Fed, Truist, Richmond County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
St Peter v. Franklin County et al
as 4:2022cv05029
Plaintiff:
Kohl R St Peter
Defendant:
Franklin County, Jim Raymond and Lee Barrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Folmar v. State of Ohio Human Resource Dept. et al
as 2:2021cv05427
Plaintiff:
Ian L Folmar
Defendant:
State of Ohio Human Resource Dept., Commissioners Office City of Columbus, Franklin County, Judge Ted Barrows and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
