Cases 21 - 30 of 1,077
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lombardo et al v. Tipton County et al
as 2:2024cv02481
Defendant:
Thomas Chapman, Lee Riley and Tipton County
Plaintiff:
Bryan Childress and Lindsey Lombardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Mitchell v. Prince George's County Police
as 24-1607
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MITCHELL
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its individual capacity and official capacity, OFFICER ERIK CHAPMAN, (PP/SH393) in his individual capacity and official capacity and BRANDON BURROUGHS, (PP/SH492) in his individual capacity and official capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chapman et al v. Weisinger et al
as 9:2024cv00116
Defendant:
Jennie Weisinger and Burke Center
Plaintiff:
Frank Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02578
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CAVORETTO v. CHAPMAN et al
as 3:2024cv00049
Defendant:
MELISSIA RUSK, JOE CHAPMAN and WALTON COUNTY GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
KRISTILEE CAVORETTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burley et al v. Chapman
as 8:2024cv00716
Plaintiff:
McKay Burley and Tyson Thomas
Defendant:
Charles J. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Gydesen v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Defendant:
Jeremy Shelly, Ariana Papaik, Will Winston and others
Pretrial Service:
Scott Bunnell
Plaintiff:
Morris Gydesen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
