Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Tims v. Golden et al
as 1:2015cv00516
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Tims
Defendant:
Shaun Golden, Scott Walden, Ray Rolin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Green et al v. City of St. Louis Missouri
as 4:2015cv01433
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Percy Green, III , Abram Pruitt, Jr. , Harrith RT Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WAGNER v. BRITTEN et al
as 2:2015cv02272
Plaintiff:
JACONDA WAGNER
Defendant:
THOMAS BRITTEN, JR., THOMAS BRITTEN, SR., JACQUELINE ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Sumter, City of
as 3:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
Robert Jackson , Lashawda Jackson , Wynisha Jackson and others
Defendant:
Sumter, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Angela M. Jones v. Taser International, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00496
Defendant:
California Highway Patrol, Does, Patrick Rick Smith and others
#18156:
CHP Officer Robert Jackson
Plaintiff:
Angela M Jones
#19544:
CHP Officer H. Rojas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Figgs et al v. Quitman County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
James Figgs and Robert Jackson
Defendant:
Quitman County, Mississippi , Quitman County, Mississippi Democratic Executive Committee and Quitman County, Mississippi Board of Election Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACKSON v. RAJOLI et al
as 1:2014cv00465
Defendant:
KATHY S. EDRINGTON and NAVEEN RAJOLI
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
